Question · asked by 1 review

CLOZAPINE vs Typical antipsychotics: Relapse

CLOZAPINE probably leads to lower relapse ‐ short term compared with TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ‐ OVERALL (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
CLOZAPINE vs TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ‐ OVERALL
Relapse ‐ short term · patients with schizophrenia
CLOZAPINE probably leads to lower relapse ‐ short term compared with TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ‐ OVERALL (moderate certainty).
Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia (2009) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.62 [0.45, 0.84]19 studies · 1303 participantsModerate
CLOZAPINE vs TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ‐ OVERALL
Relapse ‐ long term · patients with schizophrenia
CLOZAPINE probably leads to lower relapse ‐ long term compared with TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS ‐ OVERALL (moderate certainty).
Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia (2009) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.22 [0.14, 0.34]4 studies · 578 participantsModerate
CLOZAPINE vs TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS
Relapse ‐ short term · patients with schizophrenia
CLOZAPINE showed no clear difference in relapse ‐ short term compared with TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS (moderate certainty).
Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia (2009) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.04 [0.61, 1.78]4 studies · 396 participantsModerate
CLOZAPINE vs TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS
Relapse ‐ long term · patients with schizophrenia
CLOZAPINE probably leads to lower relapse ‐ long term compared with TYPICAL ANTIPSYCHOTICS (moderate certainty).
Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia (2009) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.17 [0.1, 0.3]1 study · 423 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia
2009 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.