Question · asked by 1 review
SOF Cervical adapter vs usual care: Preterm birth
- Population
- preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM)
- Intervention
- SOF Cervical adapter
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Preterm birth
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care Preterm birth less than 37 weeks' gestation · preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.