Cochrane · systematic review · CD010218
Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
Crowley, AE, Grivell, RM, Dodd, JM · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 8 · 57.1%Very low 6 · 42.9%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
SOF Cervical adapter versus standard care
Population: preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Perinatal mortality SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Neonatal death (death within the first 28 days of life) SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Preterm birth less than 37 weeks' gestation SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Neonatal sepsis SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | RR 1.19 [0.28, 5.09] | 1 study · 35 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Respiratory distress syndrome (as defined in individual trials) SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Chorioamnionitis (as defined in individual trials) SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | RR 1.19 [0.28, 5.09] | 1 study · 35 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Postpartum endometritis/other sepsis SOF Cervical adapter vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
SOF Immunological sealant versus standard care
Population: preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Perinatal mortality SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Neonatal death (death within the first 28 days of life) SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | RR 0.38 [0.19, 0.75] | 1 study · 94 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Preterm birth less than 37 weeks' gestation SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | RR 0.48 [0.34, 0.68] | 1 study · 94 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Neonatal sepsis SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | RR 0.64 [0.28, 1.46] | 1 study · 94 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Chorioamnionitis (as defined in individual trials) SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Respiratory distress syndrome (as defined in individual trials) SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | RR 0.64 [0.28, 1.46] | 1 study · 94 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Postpartum endometritis/other sepsis SOF Immunological sealant vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |