Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of Findings Table ‐ IncobotulinumtoxinA 24U vs OnabotulinumtoxinA 24U: Total adverse events
- Population
- glabellar lines
- Intervention
- Summary of Findings Table ‐ IncobotulinumtoxinA 24U
- Comparison
- OnabotulinumtoxinA 24U
- Outcome
- Total adverse events
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ IncobotulinumtoxinA 24U changes total adverse events compared with onabotulinumtoxinA 24U (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of Findings Table ‐ IncobotulinumtoxinA 24U vs OnabotulinumtoxinA 24U Total adverse events · glabellar lines It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ IncobotulinumtoxinA 24U changes total adverse events compared with onabotulinumtoxinA 24U (very low certainty). Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.02 [0, 1.77] | 1 study · 381 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botulinum toxin type A for facial wrinkles 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.