Question · asked by 1 review

Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish: Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading)

Population
Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL)
Intervention
Resin infiltration
Comparison
Fluoride varnish
Outcome
Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading)

Resin infiltration produced significantly greater optical improvement than fluoride varnish (MD 4.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 8.78; moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 66.7%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish
Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading) · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL) · 3 to 6 months
Resin infiltration produced significantly greater optical improvement than fluoride varnish (MD 4.76, 95% CI 0.74 to 8.78; moderate certainty).
Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or… (2021) All outcomes
MD 4.76 [0.74, 8.78]3 studies · 212 participantsModerate
Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish
Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading) · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL) · 3 to 6 months, Mild lesions, DIAGNOdent score <=14 (Ciftci et al. 2018; Giray et al. 2018)
In the mild lesions subgroup, resin infiltration gave greater optical improvement than fluoride varnish (MD 3.65, 95% CI 0.82 to 6.48; ungraded subgroup).
Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or… (2021) All outcomes
MD 3.65 [0.82, 6.48]2 studies · 172 participantsGRADE not reported
Resin infiltration vs Fluoride varnish
Optical/esthetic improvement (DIAGNOdent reading) · Patients (mainly children) with white spot lesions (WSL) · 3 to 6 months, Severe lesions, DIAGNOdent score >14 (Gozetici et al. 2019)
In the severe lesions subgroup, resin infiltration gave greater optical improvement than fluoride varnish (MD 13.15, 95% CI 3.98 to 22.32; ungraded subgroup).
Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or… (2021) All outcomes
MD 13.15 [3.98, 22.32]1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Efficacy of resin infiltration to mask post-orthodontic or non-post-orthodontic white spot lesions or fluorosis - a systematic review and…
2021 All outcomes
Not specified11Critically Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.