Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants with bone grafts or other procedures for bone augmentation such as guided bone regeneration (GBR): Cost‐effectiveness
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants with bone grafts or other procedures for bone augmentation such as guided bone regeneration (GBR) Cost effectiveness · Patients with a maxilla that cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of bone (including… · At least 1 year follow-up The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the… (2003) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004151, superseded | Results (Effects of interventions): no randomised controlled clinical trial was identified. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous… 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2013-06 | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.