Supervised maintenance programme following pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care: Exacerbations (number of people experiencing ≥ 1 exacerbations)
Supervised maintenance programme following pulmonary rehabilitation showed no clear difference in exacerbation: number of people experiencing one or more exacerbation compared with usual care (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Supervised maintenance programme following pulmonary rehabilitation vs usual care Exacerbation: number of people experiencing one or more exacerbation · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Supervised maintenance programme following pulmonary rehabilitation showed no clear difference in exacerbation: number of people experiencing one or more exacerbation compared with usual care (low certainty). Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.73 [0.26, 2.02] | 3 studies · 281 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.