Anti‐D administration in pregnancy vs no treatment: Incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation postpartum (at birth of Rh‐positive infant and at
Anti‐D administration in pregnancy showed no clear difference in incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation postpartum (at birth of… compared with no treatment (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Anti‐D administration in pregnancy vs no treatment Incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation postpartum (at birth of Rh‐positive infant and at · Rh‐negative women without anti‐D antibodies Anti‐D administration in pregnancy showed no clear difference in incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation postpartum (at birth of… compared with no treatment (low certainty). Anti‐D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.39 [0.1, 1.62] | 2 studies · 2048 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti‐D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.