RhCG vs uhCG: Ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate per woman
RhCG showed no clear difference in ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate per woman compared with uhCG (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
RhCG vs uhCG Ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate per woman · women undergoing final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles RhCG showed no clear difference in ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate per woman compared with uhCG (moderate certainty). Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.15 [0.89, 1.49] | 7 studies · 1136 participants | Moderate |
rhCG vs uhCG Ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate per woman · patients with final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles rhCG showed no clear difference in ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate per woman compared with uhCG (high certainty). Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and… (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003719.PUB3, superseded | OR 1.04 [0.79, 1.37] | 6 studies · 1019 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.