Natural cycle FET vs HT + GnRHa FET: Multiple pregnancy rate
Natural cycle FET showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT plus GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Natural cycle FET vs HT plus GnRHa suppression FET Multiple pregnancy rate per woman · subfertile women Natural cycle FET showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT plus GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty). Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.58 [0.13, 2.5] | 1 study · 159 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.