Automated oxygen delivery vs routine manual oxygen delivery: Severe ROPUnit: number of infants with event
- Population
- preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction
- Intervention
- Automated oxygen delivery
- Comparison
- routine manual oxygen delivery
- Outcome
- Severe ROPUnit: number of infants with event
Automated oxygen delivery showed no clear difference in severe ROPUnit: number of infants with event compared with routine manual oxygen delivery (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Automated oxygen delivery vs routine manual oxygen delivery Severe ROPUnit: number of infants with event · preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction Automated oxygen delivery showed no clear difference in severe ROPUnit: number of infants with event compared with routine manual oxygen delivery (low certainty). Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.24 [0.03, 1.94] | 1 study · 39 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automated oxygen delivery for preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Automated oxygen delivery vs enhanced manual oxygen delivery · preterm infants with respiratory dysfunction · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.