Question · asked by 1 review

Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs watchful waiting: Presence/persistence of OME

Population
children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
Intervention
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes
Comparison
watchful waiting
Outcome
Presence/persistence of OME

It is very uncertain whether adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes changes presence/persistence of OME (at 2 years ‐ long‐term) № of… compared with no treatment/watchful waiting (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes vs no treatment/watchful waiting
Presence/persistence of OME (at 2 years ‐ long‐term) № of participants: 232(1 RCT) · children aged 6 months to 12 years with otitis media with effusion (OME)
It is very uncertain whether adenoidectomy and ventilation tubes changes presence/persistence of OME (at 2 years ‐ long‐term) № of… compared with no treatment/watchful waiting (very low certainty).
Adenoidectomy for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.91 [0.82, 1.01]Not reportedVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Adenoidectomy for otitis media with effusion (OME) in children
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.