Question · asked by 0 reviews

One-stage lateral sinus lift with monocortical autogenous bone blocks (iliac crest) vs Two-stage lateral sinus lift with autogenous particulate bone (iliac crest): Complication (perforation of sinus membrane) at augmented site

Population
Patients with atrophic posterior maxillae/maxillary sinuses (<5 mm or 2 to 7 mm residual bone) needing implants
Intervention
One-stage lateral sinus lift with monocortical autogenous bone blocks (iliac crest)
Comparison
Two-stage lateral sinus lift with autogenous particulate bone (iliac crest)
Outcome
Complication (perforation of sinus membrane) at augmented site

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
One-stage sinus lift with monocortical iliac bone blocks vs Two-stage sinus lift with particulate iliac bone
Complication (perforation of sinus membrane) at augmented site · Patients with atrophic posterior maxillae/maxillary sinuses (<5 mm or 2 to 7 mm residual bone) needing implants · Up to 3 years post-loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003607.PUB3, superseded
No statistically significant difference (Wannfors 2000)1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported
One-stage sinus lift with monocortical iliac bone blocks vs Two-stage sinus lift with particulate iliac bone
Complication (perforation of sinus membrane) at augmented site · Patients with atrophic posterior maxillae/maxillary sinuses (<5 mm or 2 to 7 mm residual bone) needing implants · Up to 3 years post-loading
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental… (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003607.PUB2, superseded
11 perforations in 9 patients (one-stage) vs 11 in 10 patients (two-stage); no statistically significant difference (Wannfors 2000)1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment
2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
2009-06Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.