Question · asked by 0 reviews
Intermittent oral diazepam vs oral clobazam: Recurrent seizure at 60 months or greater
- Population
- children with febrile seizures
- Intervention
- Intermittent oral diazepam
- Comparison
- oral clobazam
- Outcome
- Recurrent seizure at 60 months or greater
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intermittent oral diazepam vs oral clobazam Recurrent seizure at 60 months or greater · Children with febrile seizures The review found no eligible studies for this question. Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD003031.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Intermittent oral diazepam vs intermittent oral clobazam · children with febrile seizures · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.