Question · asked by 1 review
Amifostine 200 mg/m2 three times weekly vs Amifostine 200 mg/m2 five times weekly: Quality of life
- Population
- Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
- Intervention
- Amifostine 200 mg/m2 three times weekly
- Comparison
- Amifostine 200 mg/m2 five times weekly
- Outcome
- Quality of life
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Amifostine 200 mg/m2 three times weekly vs Amifostine 200 mg/m2 five times weekly Quality of life · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT and 6, 12, 18, 24 months postRT Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes | No significant differences between the three treatment arms (Jellema 2006) | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2016-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.