Question · asked by 1 review
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management: Activities of daily living and functional performance (functional performance measured using the SPPB at 12 months) SPPB (0 to 12 points, where higher scores equate to greater functional performance)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management Activities of daily living and functional performance (NEADL score at 12 months) NEADL (0 to 22 points, where higher scores equate to greater functional performance) · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 87 participants | Very low |
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management Activities of daily living and functional performance (functional performance measured using the SPPB at 12 months) SPPB (0 to 12 points, where higher scores equate to greater functional performance) · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 87 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.