Question · asked by 1 review

Cuffed vs uncuffed tubes: Need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission to treat post extubation stridor (as defined by the trial authors)

It is very uncertain whether cuffed changes need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission to treat post… compared with uncuffed tubes (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Cuffed vs uncuffed tubes
Need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission to treat post extubation stridor (as defined by the trial authors) · Children up to eight years undergoing general anaesthesia
It is very uncertain whether cuffed changes need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission to treat post… compared with uncuffed tubes (very low certainty).
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for general anaesthesia in children aged eight years and under (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.77 [0.3, 25.78]1 study · 102 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for general anaesthesia in children aged eight years and under
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.