Question · asked by 1 review
Essential oil mouthwash vs Sterile water rinse: Incidence of VAP
- Population
- Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU
- Intervention
- Essential oil mouthwash
- Comparison
- Sterile water rinse
- Outcome
- Incidence of VAP
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Listerine (essential oils) rinse vs Sterile water rinse Incidence of VAP · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | Listerine versus sterile water (Berry 2013): no evidence of a difference in VAP incidence; single study, high risk of bias. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Listerine (essential oils) rinse vs Sterile water rinse Incidence of VAP · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia (2016) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD008367.PUB3, superseded | Listerine versus sterile water (Berry 2013): no evidence of a difference in VAP incidence; single study, high risk of bias. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Essential oil mouthwash vs Sodium bicarbonate rinse · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.