Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care vs usual care: Caesarean section
- Population
- breech presentation
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Caesarean section
Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with usual care (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care vs usual care Caesarean section · breech presentation Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with usual care (moderate certainty). Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.94 [0.83, 1.05] | 6 studies · 1030 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Summary of findings table ‐ Moxibustion plus usual care vs sham moxibustion plus usual care · breech presentation · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.