Question · asked by 1 review
Caffeinated (experimental group) vs decaffeinated group (control group): Preterm birth
- Population
- Pregnant women recruited before 20 weeks' gestation
- Intervention
- Caffeinated (experimental group)
- Comparison
- decaffeinated group (control group)
- Outcome
- Preterm birth
Caffeinated (experimental group) showed no clear difference in preterm birth compared with decaffeinated group (control group) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caffeinated (experimental group) vs decaffeinated group (control group) Preterm birth · Pregnant women recruited before 20 weeks' gestation Caffeinated (experimental group) showed no clear difference in preterm birth compared with decaffeinated group (control group) (low certainty). Effects of restricted caffeine intake by mother on fetal, neonatal and pregnancy outcomes (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.81 [0.48, 1.37] | 1 study · 1153 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effects of restricted caffeine intake by mother on fetal, neonatal and pregnancy outcomes 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.