Question · asked by 1 review
Infiltration injection LA and intraligamental injection LA (3-arm) vs no treatment: Parental satisfaction
- Population
- Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary care)
- Intervention
- Infiltration injection LA and intraligamental injection LA (3-arm)
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- Parental satisfaction
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Infiltration injection LA and intraligamental injection LA (3-arm) vs No treatment Parental satisfaction · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for… (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | No study reported parental satisfaction | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and… 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.