Question · asked by 1 review
Fluocinonide in adhesive base vs placebo: Partial response (>33% improvement)
- Population
- People with erosive oral lichen planus
- Intervention
- Fluocinonide in adhesive base
- Comparison
- placebo
- Outcome
- Partial response (>33% improvement)
Fluocinonide in adhesive base showed no clear difference in partial response (>33% improvement) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluocinonide in adhesive base vs Placebo Partial response (>33% improvement) · People with erosive oral lichen planus Fluocinonide in adhesive base showed no clear difference in partial response (>33% improvement) compared with placebo; GRADE not reported. Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 3.00 [0.62, 14.62] | 1 study · 27 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.