Question · asked by 1 review

Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease

Population
prevention of reintubation
Intervention
Doxapram
Comparison
no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or
Outcome
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia/chronic lung disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or
3b. Chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age – doxapram compared to alternative treatment for the prevention of reintubation · prevention of reintubation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found
Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or
3c. Chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age – doxapram as an adjunct to methylxanthine compared to methylxanthine alone for the prevention of reintubation · prevention of reintubation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.