Question · asked by 1 review

Bleaching gel with added remineralising agent (fluoride, calcium, or CPP-ACP) vs Bleaching alone (no remineralising agent): Enamel mineral loss / remineralisation

Population
Demineralised / white-spot-lesion enamel (in vitro specimens)
Intervention
Bleaching gel with added remineralising agent (fluoride, calcium, or CPP-ACP)
Comparison
Bleaching alone (no remineralising agent)
Outcome
Enamel mineral loss / remineralisation

Low-quality in vitro evidence indicates that adding fluoride, calcium or CPP-ACP to bleaching agents can reduce enamel mineral loss (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Bleaching gel with added remineralising agent (fluoride, calcium, or CPP-ACP) vs Bleaching alone (no remineralising agent)
Enamel mineral loss / remineralisation · Demineralised / white-spot-lesion enamel (in vitro specimens) · In vitro laboratory studies
Low-quality in vitro evidence indicates that adding fluoride, calcium or CPP-ACP to bleaching agents can reduce enamel mineral loss (ungraded).
Is Bleaching Effective in Managing Post-orthodontic White-spot Lesions? A Systematic Review. (2020) All outcomes
Inconclusive: F/Ca/CPP-ACP additives reduced mineral loss on SOUND enamel (refs 8,10,16) but not verified for artificial caries lesions (ref 35)4 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Is Bleaching Effective in Managing Post-orthodontic White-spot Lesions? A Systematic Review.
2020 All outcomes
2018-07-0115Low / Critically Low

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.