Supplemental IV crystalloid vs control IV crystalloid volume: Nausea
Supplemental IV crystalloid probably leads to lower risk of PON, defined as the presence of subjective nausea, reported… compared with control IV crystalloid volume (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Supplemental IV crystalloid vs control IV crystalloid volume Risk of PON, defined as the presence of subjective nausea, reported dichotomously or based on a study‐defined dichotomous threshold on a continuous scale such as a VAS · participants aged 6 months or older undergoing surgical procedures under general anaesthesia Supplemental IV crystalloid probably leads to lower risk of PON, defined as the presence of subjective nausea, reported… compared with control IV crystalloid volume (moderate certainty). Supplemental perioperative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.62 [0.51, 0.75] | 18 studies · 1766 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplemental perioperative intravenous crystalloids for postoperative nausea and vomiting 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.