Question · asked by 1 review
Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention): Completion of treatment
- Population
- Children and adolescents (0 to 16 years) needing dental treatment
- Intervention
- Hypnosis
- Comparison
- No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention)
- Outcome
- Completion of treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention) Completion of treatment (yes/no) · Children and adolescents up to 16 years of age undergoing dental treatment The review found no eligible studies for this question. Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes | Completion of treatment was a protocol-planned primary outcome but was not reported as an outcome by any of the three included studies; statistical analysis and meta-analysis were not possible due to the insufficient… | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis for children undergoing dental treatment 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Hypnosis vs Inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide and oxygen · Children aged 10 to 16 years undergoing orthodontic extractions (Braithwaite 2005) · 1 review
- Hypnosis vs Sedation (sedative agent alone) · Children and adolescents (0 to 16 years) needing dental treatment · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.