Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions vs control group: Distress/PTSD symptoms at study endpoint (higher score = higher severity)
- Population
- preventing mental disorders
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions
- Comparison
- control group
- Outcome
- Distress/PTSD symptoms at study endpoint (higher score = higher severity)
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions vs control group Distress/PTSD symptoms at study endpoint (higher score = higher severity) · preventing mental disorders Primary‐level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 800 participants | Very low |
Summary of findings table ‐ Promotion/universal prevention interventions vs control group Distress/PTSD symptoms at study endpoint (higher score = higher severity) · preventing mental disorders Primary‐level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 722 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary‐level and community worker interventions for the prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of well‐being in low‐ and… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.