Question · asked by 1 review
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound: Induction of labour for post‐maturity
- Population
- Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
- Intervention
- First trimester routine
- Comparison
- selective ultrasound
- Outcome
- Induction of labour for post‐maturity
First trimester routine showed no clear difference in induction of labour for post‐maturity compared with selective ultrasound (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
First trimester routine vs selective ultrasound Induction of labour for post‐maturity · Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation First trimester routine showed no clear difference in induction of labour for post‐maturity compared with selective ultrasound (low certainty). Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.83 [0.5, 1.37] | 3 studies · 1474 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.