Gabapentin vs placebo: Nausea
Gabapentin probably leads to lower adverse effects: nauseaNumber of participants experiencing nausea compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Gabapentin vs placebo Adverse effects: nauseaNumber of participants experiencing nausea · people with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy Gabapentin probably leads to lower adverse effects: nauseaNumber of participants experiencing nausea compared with placebo (moderate certainty). Gabapentin add‐on treatment for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.95 | 4 studies · 1034 participants | Moderate |
Gabapentin vs placebo Adverse effects: nausea Number of participants experiencing nausea · people with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy Gabapentin probably leads to lower adverse effects: nausea Number of participants experiencing nausea compared with placebo (moderate certainty). Gabapentin add‐on treatment for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001415.PUB3, superseded | RR 0.95 | 4 studies · 1034 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabapentin add‐on treatment for drug‐resistant focal epilepsy 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.