Question · asked by 1 review

Pilocarpine vs no treatment/placebo: Quality of life (McMaster HNRQ, 1-7 scale)

Population
Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Intervention
Pilocarpine
Comparison
no treatment/placebo
Outcome
Quality of life (McMaster HNRQ, 1-7 scale)

It is very uncertain whether pilocarpine changes quality of life (McMaster HNRQ, 1-7 scale) compared with no treatment/placebo (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Pilocarpine vs No treatment/placebo
Quality of life (McMaster HNRQ, 1-7 scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · Up to and including 6 months postRT
It is very uncertain whether pilocarpine changes quality of life (McMaster HNRQ, 1-7 scale) compared with no treatment/placebo (very low certainty).
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 0.20 [-0.19, 0.59]1 study · 90 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2016-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.