Question · asked by 1 review

Fractional laser vs non‐fractional non‐ablative laser: Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants with > 50% improvement in acne scars

Population
people with acne scars
Intervention
Fractional laser
Comparison
non‐fractional non‐ablative laser
Outcome
Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants with > 50% improvement in acne scars

It is very uncertain whether fractional laser changes participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants… compared with non‐fractional non‐ablative laser (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fractional laser vs non‐fractional non‐ablative laser
Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants with > 50% improvement in acne scars · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether fractional laser changes participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants… compared with non‐fractional non‐ablative laser (very low certainty).
Interventions for acne scars (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4 [1.25, 12.84]1 study · 64 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for acne scars
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.