Question · asked by 0 reviews
CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT vs treatment: Lost to treatment
- Population
- people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
- Intervention
- CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT
- Comparison
- treatment
- Outcome
- Lost to treatment
CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT may leads to higher lost to treatment compared with TREATMENT (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT vs TREATMENT Lost to treatment · patients with both severe mental illness and substance misuse CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT may leads to higher lost to treatment compared with TREATMENT (low certainty). Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001088.PUB3, superseded | RR 1.65 [1.18, 2.31] | 1 study · 176 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT vs usual care · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.