Question · asked by 1 review
Ion-releasing restorations (IRR): RMGIC, HVGIC, GIC, compomer/PMRC, giomer vs Composite resin (CR), including bulk-fill composite: Absence of marginal discoloration
- Population
- Children receiving dental restorations (aged 4-11 years; primary teeth; Class I/II/V cavities)
- Intervention
- Ion-releasing restorations (IRR): RMGIC, HVGIC, GIC, compomer/PMRC, giomer
- Comparison
- Composite resin (CR), including bulk-fill composite
- Outcome
- Absence of marginal discoloration
No significant difference between IRR and CR in marginal discoloration (moderate certainty; downgraded for inconsistency).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Ion-releasing restorations (IRR): RMGIC, HVGIC, GIC, compomer/PMRC, giomer vs Composite resin (CR), including bulk-fill composite Absence of marginal discoloration · Children receiving dental restorations (aged 4-11 years; primary teeth; Class I/II/V cavities) · 1 to 2 years, Pediatric dentistry; primary molars/teeth (Class I, II, V cavities); trials from Turkey, Greece, Sweden, Brazil, and China No significant difference between IRR and CR in marginal discoloration (moderate certainty; downgraded for inconsistency). Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental… (2025) All outcomes | RR 1.00 [0.93, 1.08] | 6 studies · 872 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic… 2025 All outcomes | Up to January 2024 | 16 | Moderate / Moderate |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.