Question · asked by 1 review

Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT): Death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes

Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Subgroup analyses: early vs standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT)
Death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes · AKI
Subgroup analyses: early showed no clear difference in death by AKI aetiology: non‐surgical causes compared with standard initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (moderate certainty).
Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.01 [0.94, 1.09]9 studies · 4461 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Timing of kidney replacement therapy initiation for acute kidney injury
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.