Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs another fish oil LE: Any sepsis (clinical and/or culture positive)
Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) showed no clear difference in any sepsis (clinical or culture positive (or both)) – MOFS‐LE vs… compared with another fish oil LE (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs another fish oil LE Any sepsis (clinical or culture positive (or both)) – MOFS‐LE vs MFS‐LE · parenterally fed preterm infants Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) showed no clear difference in any sepsis (clinical or culture positive (or both)) – MOFS‐LE vs… compared with another fish oil LE (low certainty). Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.69 [0.56, 5.11] | 1 study · 55 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.