Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration) vs 1450 to 1500 ppm F toothpaste: Fluorosis (percentage prevalence in permanent teeth)
- Population
- Children who used topical fluoride under 6 years old; fluorosis assessed in permanent teeth at 6 to 17 years
- Intervention
- Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration)
- Comparison
- 1450 to 1500 ppm F toothpaste
- Outcome
- Fluorosis (percentage prevalence in permanent teeth)
Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration) led to lower fluorosis (percentage prevalence in permanent teeth) compared with fluoride toothpaste 1450 ppm (higher concentration); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration) vs Fluoride toothpaste 1450 ppm (higher concentration) Fluorosis (percentage prevalence in permanent teeth) · Children who used topical fluoride under 6 years old; fluorosis assessed in permanent teeth at 6 to 17 years · Fluorosis assessed when most permanent teeth of interest had erupted (6 to 17 years) Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration) led to lower fluorosis (percentage prevalence in permanent teeth) compared with fluoride toothpaste 1450 ppm (higher concentration); GRADE not reported. Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD007693.PUB2, superseded | RR 0.59 [0.44, 0.79] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children 2024 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2022-07 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Fluoride toothpaste 440 ppm (lower concentration) vs 1450 to 1500 ppm F toothpaste · Children exposed to topical fluoride when under 6 years old; fluorosis assessed in… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.