Question · asked by 0 reviews

GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm): Change in gingival recession (REC)

Population
Adults with localised or multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm)
Intervention
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes
Comparison
Guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm)
Outcome
Change in gingival recession (REC)

GTR rm associated with bone substitutes showed no clear difference in gingival recession change compared with guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm)
Gingival recession change · Adults with localised or multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes showed no clear difference in gingival recession change compared with guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm); GRADE not reported.
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD007161.PUB2, superseded
MD 0.46 [-0.02, 0.94]2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
15 January 2018Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.