Question · asked by 1 review

Removable tooth-borne expansion (expansion plate) vs observation: Crossbite correction

Population
Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or both), or other syndrome associated with craniofacial anomalies (included studies were children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years)
Intervention
Removable tooth-borne expansion (expansion plate)
Comparison
observation
Outcome
Crossbite correction

Removable tooth-borne expansion (expansion plate) leads to higher crossbite correction compared with observation (no treatment) (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Removable tooth-borne expansion (expansion plate) vs Observation (no treatment)
Crossbite correction · Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or… · Children (7 to 11 years)
Removable tooth-borne expansion (expansion plate) leads to higher crossbite correction compared with observation (no treatment) (high certainty).
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 25.26 [13.08, 48.77]3 studies · 148 participantsHigh

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-04Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.