Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention: Adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialists Time frame: 3 months
Vitamin D showed no clear difference in adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialistsTime frame:… compared with placebo or no intervention (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention Adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialistsTime frame: 6.5 months (mean) · children under 5 years of age Vitamin D showed no clear difference in adverse effect: hypercalciuria As defined by trialistsTime frame:… compared with placebo or no intervention (moderate certainty). Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 2.03 [0.28, 14.67] | 2 studies · 68 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on linear growth and other health outcomes among children under five years of age 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.