Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes): Large‐for‐gestational age
- Population
- pregnant women with GDM
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet
- Comparison
- no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)
- Outcome
- Large‐for‐gestational age
Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) Large‐for‐gestational age · pregnant women with GDM Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) (low certainty). Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.17 [0.65, 2.12] | 1 study · 123 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.