Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal midazolam vs placebo: Incomplete procedure
Intranasal midazolam showed no clear difference in incomplete procedure compared with placebo (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intranasal midazolam vs placebo Incomplete procedure · Children requiring sedation before voiding cystourethrograms and adults undergoing MRI Intranasal midazolam showed no clear difference in incomplete procedure compared with placebo (low certainty). Midazolam for sedation before procedures (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.14 [0.02, 1.12] | 2 studies · 149 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midazolam for sedation before procedures 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.