Question · asked by 1 review
Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs): Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points)
- Population
- Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
- Intervention
- Posterior cruciate ligament retention
- Comparison
- sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)
- Outcome
- Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs) Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range of points 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain)) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of… Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating… (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design… · 1 review
- Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.