Question · asked by 1 review
One‐to‐one structured care vs usual care: Rate of caesarean section
- Population
- healthy pregnant women
- Intervention
- One‐to‐one structured care
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Rate of caesarean section
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with usual care (high certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
One‐to‐one structured care vs usual care Rate of caesarean section · healthy pregnant women One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with usual care (high certainty). Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.93 [0.84, 1.02] | 1 study · 4996 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.