Question · asked by 1 review

Western/Northern Europe (UN M49 region) vs Eastern/Southern Europe (UN M49 geographical categorization): Odds of higher caries (DMFT) category

In the adjusted ordinal model geographical location was not independently significant for DMFT category (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.35); not GRADE-rated.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Western/Northern Europe (UN M49 region) vs Eastern/Southern Europe (UN M49 geographical categorization)
Odds of higher caries (DMFT) category · 12-year-old children across European countries (national/regional epidemiological surveys, 2011-2022) · Cross-sectional (survey data 2011-2022), European countries; ordinal logistic regression of DMFT category on socioeconomic indicators (adjusted), Geographical location (ordinal logistic regression, adjusted)
In the adjusted ordinal model geographical location was not independently significant for DMFT category (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.35); not GRADE-rated.
Caries status in 12-year-old children, geographical location and socioeconomic conditions across European… (2025) All outcomes
OR 0.57 [0.24, 1.35]Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.