Question · asked by 1 review
VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs usual care: Compliance Measured using: loss to
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE Compliance Measured using: loss to · patients with treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness Virtual reality for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 156 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.