Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: Single vs combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy: Adverse events during treatment
- Population
- adults and children with cystic fibrosis
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: Single
- Comparison
- combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy
- Outcome
- Adverse events during treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: Single vs combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy Adverse events during treatment · children and adults with cystic fibrosis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Single versus combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Summary of findings: single vs combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy Adverse events during treatment · children and adults with cystic fibrosis Single versus combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 131 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single versus combination intravenous anti‐pseudomonal antibiotic therapy for people with cystic fibrosis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.