Question · asked by 1 review
Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy: Quality of life FACT/the GOG‐Ntx questionnaire scores (0 ‐ 100, lower score = better)
- Population
- adults with neuropathic pain
- Intervention
- Acupuncture combined with other active therapy
- Comparison
- other active therapy
- Outcome
- Quality of life FACT/the GOG‐Ntx questionnaire scores (0 ‐ 100, lower score = better)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupuncture combined with other active therapy vs other active therapy Quality of life FACT/the GOG‐Ntx questionnaire scores (0 ‐ 100, lower score = better) · adults with neuropathic pain Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 104 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture for neuropathic pain in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.