Question · asked by 1 review

Prednisone (oral, commencing 25 mg with phased dose reduction over 2 months) vs placebo: Total number of new lesions over 2-month treatment period

Population
Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and clinical examination; excluding those with Behcet's disease, Reiter's syndrome, recurrent erythema multiforme, viral infection, coeliac disease, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, anaemia or haematinic deficiency
Intervention
Prednisone (oral, commencing 25 mg with phased dose reduction over 2 months)
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Total number of new lesions over 2-month treatment period

Prednisone (oral, commencing 25 mg with phased dose reduction over 2… led to lower total number of new lesions over 2-month treatment period compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prednisone (oral, commencing 25 mg with phased dose reduction over 2 months) vs Placebo
Total number of new lesions over 2-month treatment period · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 2 months
Prednisone (oral, commencing 25 mg with phased dose reduction over 2… led to lower total number of new lesions over 2-month treatment period compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -4.20 [-4.84, -3.56]1 study · 40 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers)
2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
2012-06Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.