Question · asked by 1 review
0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase vs ciclosporin: Physician Global Assessment (Thongprasom score)
- Population
- People with erosive oral lichen planus
- Intervention
- 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase
- Comparison
- ciclosporin
- Outcome
- Physician Global Assessment (Thongprasom score)
0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase showed no clear difference in physician Global Assessment (Thongprasom score) compared with ciclosporin solution; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase vs Ciclosporin solution Physician Global Assessment (Thongprasom score) · People with erosive oral lichen planus 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase showed no clear difference in physician Global Assessment (Thongprasom score) compared with ciclosporin solution; GRADE not reported. Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 0.61 [-0.79, 2.01] | 1 study · 11 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.