Question · asked by 1 review

Skin color / ethnicity vs Reference skin color / ethnicity: Oral health-related quality of life

Population
Adolescents (10-19 years)
Intervention
Skin color / ethnicity
Comparison
Reference skin color / ethnicity
Outcome
Oral health-related quality of life

There is no concrete evidence on the impact of skin color/ethnicity on OHRQoL in adolescents (evidence gap; narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Skin color / ethnicity vs Reference skin color / ethnicity
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Adolescents (10-19 years) · Community/school/clinic settings; adolescents 10-19 years; included reviews conducted in multiple countries
There is no concrete evidence on the impact of skin color/ethnicity on OHRQoL in adolescents (evidence gap; narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).
Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. (2023) All outcomes
Biological data such as skin color and age have no concrete evidence about this impact in the OHRQoL. Important aspects like gender and skin color did not have their level of impact clarified.Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review.
2023 All outcomes
January 202222Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.